Skip to the comparison
PasteOkay
Create a paste
Menu

Pastebins · Comparison

PasteOkay vs Hastebin: a quick paste or a private handoff

Hastebin is the fastest way to turn text into a URL. PasteOkay asks a different question: who should be able to open that URL, and for how long?

Updated · 4 min read · PasteOkay is our own product, so read this as a vendor comparison. Features were checked in October 2026.

In short

  • Choose PasteOkay when the link needs a password, an expiry or an encryption key that stays in your browser.
  • Choose Hastebin when you want the shortest possible path from a snippet to a URL and nothing else.
  • Features and prices were checked in October 2026; verify the current details with each provider.

PasteOkay

Choose PasteOkay when the link needs a password, an expiry or an encryption key that stays in your browser.

  • Password gate, expiry and burn after reading on the same page
  • Browser encryption with the key outside the server's reach
  • A manage link for editing or deleting the paste later
Create a paste

Hastebin

Choose Hastebin when you want the shortest possible path from a snippet to a URL and nothing else.

  • Extremely small interface with almost no friction
  • Open source and easy to self-host
  • Syntax highlighting for common languages
Visit Hastebin

Side by side

PasteOkay and Hastebin compared
Capability PasteOkay Hastebin
Account required No No
Expiry control 10 minutes to 30 days Limited or instance-defined
Client-side encryption Yes No
Password protection Yes No
Burn after reading Yes No
Edit or delete later Manage link Not built in
Self-hosting Not packaged Yes
Price Free, PRO $5 once Free

A dash means the feature is not offered in the standard flow. Plans and limits change; verify the current details with each provider before relying on them.

Hastebin optimises for one thing

Hastebin does not try to be a document platform. You open it, paste, press a key and copy the URL. The interface is sparse, the code is open source and the whole product fits in your head. For a quick error log in a chat or a snippet in a code review, that speed is hard to beat.

The same minimalism means there is no password, no client-side encryption and no burn after reading. If the URL leaks, the text leaks. For a stack trace that is fine. For an internal token it is not.

Expiry and deletion

Hastebin's retention depends on the instance you use. There is no rich menu of lifetimes and no manage link that lets the author replace the content later. PasteOkay exposes the lifetime as a first-class choice and returns a manage link that is shown once and stored only as a hash on the server.

That manage link also solves a common mistake. If you paste the wrong window or forget to redact a header, you can replace or delete the paste without asking an operator. On Hastebin, the practical fix is to create a second paste and hope the first one is ignored.

Which service fits your workflow

Pick Hastebin for a public snippet that has no sensitive value. Pick PasteOkay when the paste is a handoff: a password reset, a temporary credential, a private note to a colleague, or a log you do not want search engines to keep.

Which one should you choose?

Choose PasteOkay if

  • The link will be sent over chat and may be forwarded
  • You want the text to disappear on a timer
  • You need to correct or delete the paste later

Choose Hastebin if

  • You want the smallest possible paste interface
  • You run your own Hastebin instance and control retention
  • The content is public and has no sensitive value

Frequently asked questions

Does Hastebin support passwords?

The upstream project is deliberately minimal and does not offer a password-protected paste flow. Some forks add features, so check the instance you use.

Is PasteOkay slower than Hastebin?

The editor is a static page with a small script and no external dependencies. The extra work is the proof of work and the Turnstile check, which usually add a fraction of a second and keep automated abuse out.

Can I self-host PasteOkay?

The project is built for Cloudflare Pages, Functions and D1. You can deploy your own copy with the same configuration, but there is no single-click self-hosting package.

Which one should I use for code review?

Hastebin is fine for public code. If the code contains customer data, private keys or internal endpoints, use PasteOkay with an expiry and, when possible, browser encryption.

More comparisons

Pastebins

PasteOkay vs dpaste

dpaste is a dependable Django pastebin with simple expiry options. We compare its public listing, password support and encryption with PasteOkay.

Read the comparison

Pastebins

PasteOkay vs Pastebin.com

Pastebin.com is the best known paste service. We compare its expiry rules, ads, public archive and privacy model with PasteOkay's encrypted, account-free editor.

Read the comparison

Code and docs

PasteOkay vs GitHub Gist

GitHub Gist is where developers keep snippets. We compare its version history, public discovery and account requirement with PasteOkay's private, expiring pastes.

Read the comparison

Try the paste that expires

No account. Choose a lifetime, add a password if you need one, and encrypt in your browser when the text should never reach the server in readable form.

Create a paste All comparisons